To,
The Honorable Chief Justice,
Supreme Court of India,
New Delhi, INDIA.
Respected Sir,
I have the utmost respect to the Judiciary and I treat the Supreme Court as a Temple of Democracy and I advocate for Proactive and Independent Judiciary, also it must be accountable and answerable at the same time for the people. I would like to bring the following 3 issues into your notice to seek the answers.
Issue 1: Can you meet the petitioner/respondent in private while the case is pending with your bench? You met Mr. KCR (k. Chandrashekar Rao) president of TRS party in a private meeting on 10th Oct 2014. He is the respondent in one of the Civil WP 210 of 2014 (AP State Bifurcation) case and you ordered to serve the notices to him on 28th Mar 2014. How you can meet him in private? Doesn’t it amounts to ethical violation? If so how can we expect unbiased judgment from you, since you are the present Chief Justice of India, it also created mistrust on Supreme Court of India itself. Hence I request your honor should abstain himself from all AP State bifurcation cases.
Issue 2: As per Article 368 if any bill going to change the representation of states in Parliament it must be approved by both the houses of the Parliament with 2/3rd majority and it must be sent to all States Assemblies for ratification. Upon 50% of the State’s approval that bill can be sent for President’s approval. Upon President’s approval that bill will became as an Act and it will be implemented from its appointment date. UPA violated the Article 368 while making Andhra Pradesh State Reorganization Act 2014 and it didn’t sent the bill to all State Assemblies for their approval, by doing this UPA govt. took away the voting rights of the 28 States. As a result 1/10th of Indian population is under the rule of two illegally (Telangana and Andhra state) formed governments, and people are struggling, lots of public money is getting wasted, and also it is bogging down the Indian economy. This Act divided self-sustained state into 2 unstable states, now both new states are begging for centers help, for special status and grants.
Article 368’s violation is the biggest breach ever happened in Indian history, it is the most dangerous and unacceptable. The Supreme Court’s primary duty is to safeguard the Constitution, and it is supposed to take up this case on its own through suo-motu action and suppose to block the illegal act with outmost urgency, instead it is blocking and delaying the Justice, Why? I brought this injustice through Civil Writ Petition 456 of 2014 in front of summer vacation bench in May 2014 before the implementation date (2nd June 2014) of this unconstitutional Act, they referred this case to your bench, it came before your honor on 3rd July 2014, your honor ordered to serve the notices and tagged with Civil WP 161 of 2014. It was listed along with the other cases on 20th Aug 2014. The registry took away all the cases from listing on 19th Aug 2014 and till today the matter hasn’t been listed for hearing, Why?
Issue 3: I wrote couple of letter petitions from USA for suo-motu action before Oct 2013, because of Supreme Courts inaction, I e-filed Civil Writ Petition 207 of 2014 on 17th Dec 2013 as petitioner in person. My case was supposed to be listed in front of constitutional bench, since my contention is that the Indian States are sovereign and Article 3 is not as per the fundamentals and principles of a union. My argument is that Article 3 is like an appendix in our body, now it is in acute condition, so it must be removed. Instead of hearing my case in front of constitutional bench, under your honor the SC Bench tagged my case along with WP(C) 161 / 2014 and bundled all the cases which was filed against AP State division. I came to India twice and attended the case. Why my case hasn’t been heard and referred to Constitutional bench on 5th May 2014?
The group of Minster’s (GOM on AP State Bifurcation) took just 55 days to divide AP State, Honorable President gave 42 days to Andhra Pradesh state assembly to elicit its views. The parliament didn’t even spend two days to discuss and approve AP Reorganization Bill 2013 in democratic way. UPA govt. had spent 60 days without filing the counter reply, on top of it they requested 45 days more time to file the reply. And the SC ignored the facts that the AP State bifurcation Act is coming into force from June 2nd and still gave the respondents 45 day’s extension, the SC bench is supposed to take up this case in 1st week of July and it should have been referred to the Constitutional Bench, instead of doing so SC gave extra 50 days’ time and listed it on Aug 20th and encouraging the murderers of the democracy and Constitutional violators to cover up their tracks. The question arises is this court also taking part as one of them? How come the registry can withdraw the case on 19th Aug 2014 from listing? Till today the Union government is failed to submit the counter reply, how long the honorable court going to entertain the respondents and delay the Justice?
I beg your honor to dissociate my cases (Civil WP 207 and 456 of 2014) from other cases and list them in front of Constitutional bench immediately after Diwali vacation and give the utmost priority to these cases and pronounce the judgment or at the least interim relief before the coming winter vacation and regain the public trust and save the Constitution.
Thanking You,
Vishnu Alluri
The Honorable Chief Justice,
Supreme Court of India,
New Delhi, INDIA.
Respected Sir,
I have the utmost respect to the Judiciary and I treat the Supreme Court as a Temple of Democracy and I advocate for Proactive and Independent Judiciary, also it must be accountable and answerable at the same time for the people. I would like to bring the following 3 issues into your notice to seek the answers.
Issue 1: Can you meet the petitioner/respondent in private while the case is pending with your bench? You met Mr. KCR (k. Chandrashekar Rao) president of TRS party in a private meeting on 10th Oct 2014. He is the respondent in one of the Civil WP 210 of 2014 (AP State Bifurcation) case and you ordered to serve the notices to him on 28th Mar 2014. How you can meet him in private? Doesn’t it amounts to ethical violation? If so how can we expect unbiased judgment from you, since you are the present Chief Justice of India, it also created mistrust on Supreme Court of India itself. Hence I request your honor should abstain himself from all AP State bifurcation cases.
Issue 2: As per Article 368 if any bill going to change the representation of states in Parliament it must be approved by both the houses of the Parliament with 2/3rd majority and it must be sent to all States Assemblies for ratification. Upon 50% of the State’s approval that bill can be sent for President’s approval. Upon President’s approval that bill will became as an Act and it will be implemented from its appointment date. UPA violated the Article 368 while making Andhra Pradesh State Reorganization Act 2014 and it didn’t sent the bill to all State Assemblies for their approval, by doing this UPA govt. took away the voting rights of the 28 States. As a result 1/10th of Indian population is under the rule of two illegally (Telangana and Andhra state) formed governments, and people are struggling, lots of public money is getting wasted, and also it is bogging down the Indian economy. This Act divided self-sustained state into 2 unstable states, now both new states are begging for centers help, for special status and grants.
Article 368’s violation is the biggest breach ever happened in Indian history, it is the most dangerous and unacceptable. The Supreme Court’s primary duty is to safeguard the Constitution, and it is supposed to take up this case on its own through suo-motu action and suppose to block the illegal act with outmost urgency, instead it is blocking and delaying the Justice, Why? I brought this injustice through Civil Writ Petition 456 of 2014 in front of summer vacation bench in May 2014 before the implementation date (2nd June 2014) of this unconstitutional Act, they referred this case to your bench, it came before your honor on 3rd July 2014, your honor ordered to serve the notices and tagged with Civil WP 161 of 2014. It was listed along with the other cases on 20th Aug 2014. The registry took away all the cases from listing on 19th Aug 2014 and till today the matter hasn’t been listed for hearing, Why?
Issue 3: I wrote couple of letter petitions from USA for suo-motu action before Oct 2013, because of Supreme Courts inaction, I e-filed Civil Writ Petition 207 of 2014 on 17th Dec 2013 as petitioner in person. My case was supposed to be listed in front of constitutional bench, since my contention is that the Indian States are sovereign and Article 3 is not as per the fundamentals and principles of a union. My argument is that Article 3 is like an appendix in our body, now it is in acute condition, so it must be removed. Instead of hearing my case in front of constitutional bench, under your honor the SC Bench tagged my case along with WP(C) 161 / 2014 and bundled all the cases which was filed against AP State division. I came to India twice and attended the case. Why my case hasn’t been heard and referred to Constitutional bench on 5th May 2014?
The group of Minster’s (GOM on AP State Bifurcation) took just 55 days to divide AP State, Honorable President gave 42 days to Andhra Pradesh state assembly to elicit its views. The parliament didn’t even spend two days to discuss and approve AP Reorganization Bill 2013 in democratic way. UPA govt. had spent 60 days without filing the counter reply, on top of it they requested 45 days more time to file the reply. And the SC ignored the facts that the AP State bifurcation Act is coming into force from June 2nd and still gave the respondents 45 day’s extension, the SC bench is supposed to take up this case in 1st week of July and it should have been referred to the Constitutional Bench, instead of doing so SC gave extra 50 days’ time and listed it on Aug 20th and encouraging the murderers of the democracy and Constitutional violators to cover up their tracks. The question arises is this court also taking part as one of them? How come the registry can withdraw the case on 19th Aug 2014 from listing? Till today the Union government is failed to submit the counter reply, how long the honorable court going to entertain the respondents and delay the Justice?
I beg your honor to dissociate my cases (Civil WP 207 and 456 of 2014) from other cases and list them in front of Constitutional bench immediately after Diwali vacation and give the utmost priority to these cases and pronounce the judgment or at the least interim relief before the coming winter vacation and regain the public trust and save the Constitution.
Thanking You,
Vishnu Alluri
